Mexico 2007 and 2008

Discussion about cichlids from Central America

Re: Mexico 2007 and 2008

Postby smitty » Fri Jul 06, 2012 6:31 pm

I can not wait until the day i get to experience a trip to C/A and S/A.
150gal- Dovi's; 3 AC 110 P.Filters; 2 AC 110 P.Heads; Eheim 2217,2260
180gal- Managuense; 3 AC 110 P.Filters; 2 AC 110 P.Heads; Eheim 2217,2260; FX5
210gal- Argta,Bifsct,Fnstrtus,Maculcda,Regani,Syns,Zntus; 4 AC P.Filters; 2 AC P.Hds; Eheim 2250,2262; FX5
User avatar
smitty
 
Posts: 216
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:27 am
Location: Yeadon, Pennsylvania

Re: Mexico 2007 and 2008

Postby Rico Morgenstern » Sun Jul 08, 2012 12:53 am

Michi,thanks for the insights. So let's see what will further happen with P. thermalis.

The species has been 'revalidated' by Poeser 2003, but his reasoning is quite a joke:

This species was not investigated. However, since its type locality describes a
very specific environment, i.e., a sulphurous, hot spring, this species is considered valid as
long as P. sulphuraria (Alvarez, 1948) is also considered valid


The P. mexicana looks really great. It is beyond me why such jewels are so rare in the hobby, while the shops are full of those unspeakable breeds which look like plastic and are probably not even derrived from pure species. Both P. mexicana and the true P. sphenops (in the early hobby literature confused with P. formosa) have been introduced at the beginning of the 20th century, but since Regan (1906-08) has erroneously synonymized them, they were soon confused and possibly hybridized. Other strains, which would now be referrable to separate species (perhaps even including the sailfin mollies), have further contributed to the 'mishmash'.
Rico Morgenstern
CichlidRoom Expert
 
Posts: 272
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:01 am
Location: Germany

Previous

Return to Central American Cichlids

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests