Searching for Relative Intestinal Lengths of Xenotilapia

A place to discuss the wonderful assemblage of lake Tanganyika cichlids from the tribe Ectodini, like Callochromis, Xenotilapia, Enantiopus, Cyathopharynx and Ophthalmotilapia!

Moderator: Thomas Andersen

Searching for Relative Intestinal Lengths of Xenotilapia

Postby Gerd » Sat Jan 31, 2009 2:05 pm

Hello,
Reflecting questions about the right diet for Xenotilapia from the rocky habitats,
(e.g. X. spiloptera, X. papilio, X. leptura)
I’m searching for informations about their “Relative Intestinal Lengths”, a parameter, that tells a lot about nutrition.
I found parameters about some other Xenotilapia, from the sandy habitats, ranging from 0,8:1 to 1,2:1. (Thank you, Estelle and Benoit for publishing the original descriptions of M. Poll on your extraordinary site!) But unfortunately I can’t find informations about the species listet above and I presume, they are far longer! (from 2:1 to about 3,5:1 ??)
Does somebody know?
Or can give me a link, where to search for information?

Thank you!
Regards
Gerd
Gerd
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 6:21 am
Location: Germany

Re: Searching for Relative Intestinal Lengths of Xenotilapia

Postby Thomas Andersen » Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:12 am

Hi Gerd,

I should be able to find the intestinal lengths in my notes somewhere, just give me a day or two.

Until then, here is the result of Büscher's examination of the gut-content of Xenotilapia papilio:

90 % Ostracods
10 % Copepods, insect larvae, algae, sand.

Thomas
User avatar
Thomas Andersen
CichlidRoom Expert
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 10:22 am
Location: Skanderborg, Denmark

Re: Searching for Relative Intestinal Lengths of Xenotilapia

Postby Gerd » Sun Feb 01, 2009 12:06 pm

Hello Thomas!
Thomas Andersen wrote:I should be able to find the intestinal lengths in my notes somewhere

FINE !!
I knew, I could reckon on you!
THANKS FOR YOUR EFFORT !
Thomas Andersen wrote:just give me a day or two.

I'll even give you three! :)
Thomas Andersen wrote:90 % Ostracods

That's astonishing. I would have supposed more unidentified organic material, detritus. But Ostracods, living on and from detritus, sure correspond to a more or less detritivorous nutrition.
Would "selective detritivorous" be an appropriate definition?

Regards
Gerd
Gerd
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 6:21 am
Location: Germany

Re: Searching for Relative Intestinal Lengths of Xenotilapia

Postby Thomas Andersen » Sun Feb 01, 2009 12:46 pm

Actually Büscher label X. papilio as a zoo-benthivore, apparently sifting the layers of detritus, eating anything ediable, and then expelling the non-editable parts (in this case detritus), just like the species found on the pure sandfloor would do with sandgrains.

Thomas
User avatar
Thomas Andersen
CichlidRoom Expert
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 10:22 am
Location: Skanderborg, Denmark

Re: Searching for Relative Intestinal Lengths of Xenotilapia

Postby Gerd » Sun Feb 01, 2009 1:10 pm

Hello!
Thats interesting! So I was probably wrong, supposing a longer RIL.
Now I eagerly wait for data. Those for X. leptura too.
Thank you!
Gerd
Gerd
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 6:21 am
Location: Germany

Re: Searching for Relative Intestinal Lengths of Xenotilapia

Postby Thomas Andersen » Wed Feb 04, 2009 4:18 am

Well Gerd, I have checked my notes and several papers, and I can't find any data on the gut-length of A. leptura and X. spiloptera - I was quite certain I had the data somewhere, sorry.

But, I did find some references for the diet of A. leptura - 220 specimens were examined and the gut-content were:

48 % filamentous algae

52 % unicellar algae

0 % (!!) crustaceans, insect larvae, debris, sand.

The original description of X. spiloptera mentions nothing on external morphological features, so there's no data on gut-length, but I think it's similar to many other species of Xenotilapia, that are predominately carnivorous micro-predators of small crustaceans and insect-larvae.

Thomas
User avatar
Thomas Andersen
CichlidRoom Expert
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 10:22 am
Location: Skanderborg, Denmark

Re: Searching for Relative Intestinal Lengths of Xenotilapia

Postby sidguppy » Wed Feb 04, 2009 11:09 am

wow

that means that Asprotilapia is fairly unique in Ectodines as being a true herbivore....it really IS a grazing fish, even more so than the well known Tropheus and Petrochromis


no wonder then that most people that bought the Aspro's here a few years ago, lost them. it had been a long time since Verdyuij had them, more than 10 years.
then they suddenly had a shipment wich sold really well. but a while after that none of the hobbyists I spoke still had live ones.

most lost them to bloat.....probably didn't expect a 'sandcichlid' to be even more suspectible to it than Tropheus.
"And he piled upon the whale's white hump the sum of all the rage and hate felt by his whole race. If his chest had been a cannon, he would have shot his heart upon it"
Jean-Luc Picard
User avatar
sidguppy
 
Posts: 438
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 5:46 am
Location: Brabant; Netherlands

Re: Searching for Relative Intestinal Lengths of Xenotilapia

Postby EC » Wed Feb 04, 2009 11:42 am

Thomas Andersen wrote:But, I did find some references for the diet of A. leptura - 220 specimens were examined and the gut-content were:
48 % filamentous algae
52 % unicellar algae
0 % (!!) crustaceans, insect larvae, debris, sand.


X. leptura live on algal carpet and in adult stage feed only in algae. Only juveniles have algae/small crustaceans diet.
X. spiloptera have a more complete diet and feed like juvenile leptura with small crustaceans, algae and all they can eat.

Ciao Enrico
User avatar
EC
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:43 am
Location: milan, italy

Re: Searching for Relative Intestinal Lengths of Xenotilapia

Postby Thomas Andersen » Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:09 pm

Yes, it is remarkable, and indeed a great hint at their needs in the aquarium.

Gut content of some other Ectodines:

Ophthalmotilapia nasuta:

62 % unicellar algae
24 % debris
6 % insect larvae
4 % agar-like substance
2 % crustaceans
2 % sand

Ophthalmotilapia ventralis:

42 % debris
39 % filamentous algae
15 % insect larvae
2 % unicellar algae
2 % sand
User avatar
Thomas Andersen
CichlidRoom Expert
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 10:22 am
Location: Skanderborg, Denmark

Re: Searching for Relative Intestinal Lengths of Xenotilapia

Postby Gerd » Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:48 pm

Hello to all!
Thank you Thomas, for your efforts, and thank you Enrico, for the additional informations about X. spiloptera!
Thomas Andersen wrote:48 % filamentous algae
52 % unicellar algae
0 % (!!) crustaceans, insect larvae, debris, sand.

100% herbivorous! Though I would have expected a diet, like the one of Tropheus or Eretmodus, I am surprised about 100%. I read about Petrochromis orthognatus (RIL 6,4 !)that even his diet has a rate of 3,4% crustaceans and larvae.
But I admit, I'm even more astonished about the diet of X. papilio
Thomas Andersen wrote:90 % Ostracods
10 % Copepods, insect larvae, algae, sand.

I would have expected X. papilio beeing by a higher rate herbivorous.
EC wrote:X. leptura live on algal carpet and in adult stage feed only in algae. Only juveniles have algae/small crustaceans diet.

That is corresponding with what is reported from other Aufwuchs-eating species. Juveniles need higher percentage of easily digestible proteins. And Sturmbauer e.a. report, that juveniles have a shorter RIL, compared to adults of the same species.
An highly interesting article about trophic specialization can be found here, if you download the pdf.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/b17253888v1t1130/
sidguppy wrote:that means that Asprotilapia is fairly unique in Ectodines as being a true herbivore

I'm concerned with questions like this since fairly long time. And may I offer you another result, that astonished ME,!(Maybe not you)
The RIL for Ectodus is 1,0 - No surprise!
But would you have expected 3,5 for Lestradea? And 4,0 for Cardiopharynx?
For comparison: Eretmodus 2,5 Tropheus moorii 4,8
So I learned, never feed Lestradea, like you feed Ectodus!
Regards
Gerd
Gerd
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 6:21 am
Location: Germany

Re: Searching for Relative Intestinal Lengths of Xenotilapia

Postby EC » Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:56 pm

Gerd wrote:That is corresponding with what is reported from other Aufwuchs-eating species. Juveniles need higher percentage of easily digestible proteins. And Sturmbauer e.a. report, that juveniles have a shorter RIL, compared to adults of the same species.
An highly interesting article about trophic specialization can be found here, if you download the pdf.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/b17253888v1t1130/


Thank you! First time I saw X. leptura in Kambwimba was a big surprise. Not only for diet but for very long parental care (3cm. fry) and because they chase competitive feeders like red rainbow, eretmodus and petro from his territory (usually a big plate rock full of filamentous algae) or A. fasciatus and telmato when they want to prey leptura fry.

Ciao Enrico
User avatar
EC
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:43 am
Location: milan, italy


Return to Lake Tanganyika Sand-dwellers and Featherfins

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests