Moderator: Troy
jlose wrote:How many of you agree with the genus name changing from Melanochromis to Pseudotropheus? I've been keeping mbuna for 30 years and still can't get use to the constant genus changes.
Pete B wrote:jlose wrote:How many of you agree with the genus name changing from Melanochromis to Pseudotropheus? I've been keeping mbuna for 30 years and still can't get use to the constant genus changes.
It doesn't matter if we agree or not with the name changes, it's not done for the benefit of the hobbyist.
The more biologists study these fish, the more knowledge is gained.
Species which were originally placed in one genus, are found to be more closely related to another, so are placed within that genus.
By using the scientific name, anyone, no matter what nationality, can communicate regarding the same fish.
I still see fish in retailers tanks with names that changed over 10 years ago.![]()
If we use the "common" name confusion can arise, for instance when mbuna keepers talk about "yellow labs" the fish in question is Labidochromis caeruleus, but to others it could mean Hericthys labridens.
In the retail trade, manufacturers change product names, but it doesn't take long for everyone to start using them.
Why is it any different for fish?
.
jlose wrote:I j How many of you agree with the genus name changing from Melanochromis to Pseudotropheus?
Return to Lake Malawi Cichlids
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest