cichla wrote:Thank you, Mike, to let us peep behind the scene.
Good that you - as a leading experts in Apistogramma - confirm the specific identity of Apistogramma sp. „Rio Caqueta“ (as in Staeck & Linke 2006) and Apistogramma playayacu.
Funny enough Römer et al (2011) cited the book by Staeck & Linke (there as Linke & Staeck), but still not recognize that Staeck & Linke printed the new species in the book.
I am just puzzled why you are – as a team member – not part of the authors of the new taxon?
Greetings and happy new year!
P.S. I am sorry for my bad Englsih.
Mike Wise wrote:I am only a hobbyist,...My taxonomy experience is limited to Early Devonian brachiopods (MSc thesis and 1 paper in the Journal of Paleontology, ....
Cichla wrote:...Römer et al (2011) cited the book by Staeck & Linke (there as Linke & Staeck), but still not recognize that Staeck & Linke printed the new species in the book.Mike Wise wrote:I have no idea. I know that Dr. Staeck and Dr. Römer have had 'differences of opinions' in the past. Could this be a reason?
Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher and 1 guest